26 people are talking about the idea to ...

Abolish the death penalty

This issue is important to:

  • Seattle, WA
    Supports!
  • Oakton, VA
    Opposes!
  • Annandale, NY
    Supports!
  • West Hartford, CT
    Supports!
  • Greencastle, IN
    Supports!
  • Limbach-Oberfrohna, Germany
    Undecided!
  • Oakton, VA
    Supports!
  • Brighton, IL
    Opposes!
  • Greencastle, IN
    Supports!
  • Fort Wayne, IN
    Supports!

  • See all 26 people

    Thoughts:

    Edirty
    West Hartford, CT
    Supports!

    Untitled  — 6 months ago


    The fact that Canada and certain Nordic nations without the death penalty have much lower murder rates than we do here in the states suggests that the murder rate is not integrally tied to the death penalty. I am not suggesting that this is evidence that getting rid of the death penalty in our society will lower the murder rate, in fact I believe the opposite would likely be true.

    It does show, however, that we can reform our society in ways that would bring us to a less murder-prone state than we are in now without sanctioning the government to commit murder. Being against the death penalty does not mean ignoring the incentive structure that it creates, just that there are certain things the state should not have the right to do in order to lower the incentive to kill, especially when there is clearly another way to go about doing things.
    In the end, to me this is an empirical question, and if I was shown that America would be unequivocally better off (in terms of the protection of innocent life, considering the balance both of potential victims and of those wrongly convicted and sentenced to death) by keeping the death penalty, then I would be inclined to support it.

    I think the real world examples of Canada and a number EU countries without the death penalty but with lower murder rates, however, are sufficient grounds for striving to lower the murder rate in our own country without capital punishment.


    whaught
    South Glastonbury, CT
    Supports!

    Untitled  — 6 months ago

    Just think of it as a late abortion, not murder.


    ...just kidding


    ed
    West Lafayette, IN
    Supports!

    Untitled  — 6 months ago

    aside from the humanitarian ideas which conflict with the death penalty, I've always thought it's a large waste of money and labor. the money spent on lawyers and the time to put together an appeal could be used for something different, read: more productive.


    lizh
    Seattle, WA
    Supports!

    Justice  — 6 months ago

    Families of the victims of brutal crimes, for which the perpetrators are threatened with capital punishment, have testified that having the perpetrator killed, under the death penalty, will NOT relieve their suffering.

    On the contrary, murder--by the government--creates more sorrow and suffering, because the families of the perpetrators of brutal crimes now have also lost people they love.

    Condemning violence that occurs in the private sector, while committing murders itself, hypocritical of state governments.


    stephendolenc
    Vienna, VA
    Supports!

    Untitled  — 7 months ago

    Murder is murder no matter who's the perpetrator.


    Add Your Own Thought :

    This is one of the most important parts of For A Better America. Read what other users have written, reply to their Thoughts, and if you have something new to say, create your own Thought here. This is your opportunity to tell people how you feel about this idea, and more importantly, to tell them why you feel that way.

    You must log in to add comments